Examiner Miranda Huang

Grant ratio: 59.5% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2157 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.19. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 59.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.19
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87335
Primary art unit
2157
Work group
2150
Technology center
2100
Applications
210
Granted applications
125
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7092
Supervisor
David Wiley
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4150

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 63.5% 2.71
Group 119 59.3% 2.64
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.06 643 office actions across 210 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 207 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 1.4%
1 OA 37 17.6%
2 OAs 66 31.4%
3 OAs 23 11.0%
4 OAs 41 19.5%
5+ OAs 40 19.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 20.0% 2010 2011: 63.6% 2011 2012: 70.6% 2012 2013: 75.9% 2013 2014: 64.0% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 62.1% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2021: 25.0% 2021 2025: 11.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20105120.0%
2011221463.6%
2012342470.6%
2013292275.9%
2014503264.0%
2015181266.7%
2016291862.1%
2017500.0%
20214125.0%
20259111.1%
2026500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 207 0.5% 16.9% 82.1% 0.0%
Action 2 170 8.8% 14.1% 76.5% 0.0%
Action 3 104 1.9% 15.4% 81.7% 1.0%
Action 4 81 2.5% 7.4% 87.7% 2.5%
Action 5 40 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 8.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 22 office actions
All years 3.1% 20 of 643 office actions
Change -3.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
1.7%
8.6%
4.5%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 19. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 9 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 4/18 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
72.2% 13/18 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 27, 2016 13/241,834 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 22, 2016 12/339,328 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 14, 2016 13/872,001 Granted §103
Jun. 24, 2016 13/245,831 Reversed §103
May. 19, 2016 13/406,478 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 11, 2016 12/435,754 Affirmed in part §102
May. 11, 2016 13/287,313 Reversed N/A
Apr. 27, 2016 12/242,752 Reversed §102 · §103
Apr. 21, 2016 13/764,247 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 15, 2016 12/563,973 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 4, 2015 12/512,557 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 20, 2015 12/493,409 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.