Examiner Cindy Nguyen

Grant ratio: 75.0% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2161 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.29
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78398
Primary art unit
2161
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
711
Granted applications
533
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4025
Supervisor
Apu Mofiz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4080

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 57.0% 2.44
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.35 1,670 office actions across 711 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 711 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 302 42.5%
2 OAs 154 21.7%
3 OAs 104 14.6%
4 OAs 74 10.4%
5+ OAs 77 10.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 64.7% 2008 2009: 70.5% 2009 2010: 89.3% 2010 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 97.1% 2012 2013: 87.8% 2013 2014: 89.8% 2014 2015: 71.4% 2015 2016: 81.0% 2016 2017: 28.6% 2017 2018: 44.4% 2018 2019: 71.1% 2019 2020: 64.1% 2020 2021: 78.8% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 93.2% 2023 2024: 86.0% 2024 2025: 33.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008171164.7%
2009614370.5%
2010565089.3%
2011363083.3%
2012353497.1%
2013413687.8%
2014494489.8%
2015352571.4%
2016423481.0%
201714428.6%
2018361644.4%
2019382771.1%
2020392564.1%
2021332678.8%
2022403587.5%
2023444193.2%
2024504386.0%
202527933.3%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 711 1.4% 16.0% 75.0% 1.1%
Action 2 409 3.7% 17.8% 72.4% 1.0%
Action 3 255 2.0% 19.2% 75.7% 0.0%
Action 4 151 4.0% 13.2% 80.1% 0.0%
Action 5 77 1.3% 5.2% 88.3% 0.0%
Action 6 41 0.0% 4.9% 90.2% 0.0%
Action 7 16 6.3% 6.3% 81.3% 0.0%
Action 8 8 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 3 of 167 office actions
All years 2.4% 40 of 1,670 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.6%
0.0%
4.6%
0.0%
1.9%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
1.1%
2.7%
18.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2024: AI examples
2.6%
2025: August memo
2.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 1, 2025 16/511,966 Reversed §103
Mar. 1, 2023 16/215,202 Affirmed §103
Nov. 2, 2022 14/947,689 Affirmed §103
Aug. 29, 2022 14/947,816 Affirmed §103
Jul. 5, 2022 15/359,419 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 29, 2022 15/724,947 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 30, 2020 13/603,926 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 25, 2013 11/168,551 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 21, 2012 10/807,871 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.