Examiner Camlinh Nguyen

Grant ratio: 80.7% (87th percentile in Art Unit 2161 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.94. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.94
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78921
Primary art unit
2161
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
799
Granted applications
645
Examiner phone
(571) 272-4024
Supervisor
Apu Mofiz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4080

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 57.0% 2.44
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.95 1,562 office actions across 799 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 792 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 0.9%
1 OA 385 48.2%
2 OAs 215 26.9%
3 OAs 97 12.1%
4 OAs 56 7.0%
5+ OAs 39 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 76.0% 2008 2009: 80.4% 2009 2010: 82.5% 2010 2011: 74.0% 2011 2012: 90.7% 2012 2013: 88.3% 2013 2014: 86.8% 2014 2015: 92.1% 2015 2016: 85.7% 2016 2017: 83.3% 2017 2018: 75.6% 2018 2019: 77.5% 2019 2020: 85.1% 2020 2021: 94.3% 2021 2022: 78.4% 2022 2023: 91.7% 2023 2024: 86.0% 2024 2025: 35.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008503876.0%
2009564580.4%
2010403382.5%
2011503774.0%
2012433990.7%
2013605388.3%
2014383386.8%
2015383592.1%
2016353085.7%
2017363083.3%
2018453475.6%
2019403177.5%
2020474085.1%
2021535094.3%
2022372978.4%
2023484491.7%
2024433786.0%
202520735.0%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 792 6.6% 40.3% 40.5% 1.0%
Action 2 407 9.3% 42.8% 42.8% 0.5%
Action 3 192 3.6% 24.0% 67.7% 1.0%
Action 4 95 3.2% 18.9% 69.5% 1.1%
Action 5 39 7.7% 12.8% 76.9% 0.0%
Action 6 19 0.0% 5.3% 84.2% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 9 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.4% 17 of 163 office actions
All years 6.8% 106 of 1,562 office actions
Change +3.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

8.8%
1.2%
5.4%
4.2%
4.4%
1.9%
2014: Alice
2.6%
9.7%
6.8%
9.7%
19.3%
2019: PEG
10.3%
3.3%
7.1%
2.3%
4.4%
2024: AI examples
2.8%
2025: August memo
15.8%
39.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 18. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 4/18 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
27.8% 5/18 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.6 months
New grounds of rejection
4
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 27, 2024 16/693,575 Affirmed §102
Sep. 29, 2023 15/186,196 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Oct. 24, 2022 15/815,040 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Jul. 1, 2022 15/150,296 Affirmed §102
Jul. 28, 2016 13/208,338 Affirmed §103
Feb. 10, 2016 12/429,731 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 6, 2015 13/608,434 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Oct. 5, 2015 12/912,228 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Nov. 19, 2014 12/251,292 Affirmed §103 · §120
Apr. 15, 2014 12/014,718 Affirmed in part §102
Nov. 12, 2013 11/713,905 Affirmed §102
Oct. 16, 2013 11/941,830 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.