Examiner Michael Hicks

Grant ratio: 57.0% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2165 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2016
Grant ratio 57.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81481
Primary art unit
2165
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
335
Granted applications
191

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.5% 2.59
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.05 1,021 office actions across 335 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 335 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 86 25.7%
2 OAs 82 24.5%
3 OAs 47 14.0%
4 OAs 61 18.2%
5+ OAs 59 17.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 59.3% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 67.4% 2010 2011: 72.4% 2011 2012: 48.5% 2012 2013: 58.3% 2013 2014: 55.6% 2014 2015: 45.0% 2015 2016: 61.9% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008271659.3%
2009462350.0%
2010463167.4%
2011292172.4%
2012331648.5%
2013482858.3%
2014452555.6%
2015401845.0%
2016211361.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 335 0.9% 46.3% 47.5% 0.6%
Action 2 249 2.0% 36.9% 57.0% 2.0%
Action 3 167 0.0% 32.3% 62.9% 0.6%
Action 4 120 0.0% 31.7% 64.2% 1.7%
Action 5 59 0.0% 15.3% 81.4% 0.0%
Action 6 38 0.0% 13.2% 81.6% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 22.7% 77.3% 0.0%
Action 8 14 0.0% 21.4% 78.6% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 8 of 1,021 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.0%
0.9%
1.6%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 10/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 4, 2016 13/383,592 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 4, 2016 11/747,930 Affirmed §101 · §103
Oct. 26, 2015 12/404,998 Reversed N/A
Sep. 16, 2015 12/686,962 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 10, 2014 11/097,792 Affirmed §103
Dec. 31, 2013 11/747,535 Reversed N/A
Sep. 17, 2013 11/833,884 Reversed §103
Apr. 30, 2012 09/990,770 Reversed §103
Apr. 17, 2012 10/600,382 Reversed §103
Mar. 22, 2012 10/600,797 Reversed N/A
Mar. 2, 2012 11/007,247 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Feb. 21, 2012 10/622,666 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.