Examiner Bai D. Vu

Grant ratio: 75.1% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2165 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83274
Primary art unit
2165
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
768
Granted applications
577
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1751
Supervisor
Pierre Vital
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4215

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.5% 2.59
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.42 1,858 office actions across 768 applications
Applications with office actions 98.8% 759 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 1.2%
1 OA 289 37.6%
2 OAs 221 28.8%
3 OAs 94 12.2%
4 OAs 73 9.5%
5+ OAs 82 10.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 30.8% 2008 2009: 52.4% 2009 2010: 42.3% 2010 2011: 65.9% 2011 2012: 93.0% 2012 2013: 65.9% 2013 2014: 81.4% 2014 2015: 76.5% 2015 2016: 81.6% 2016 2017: 64.7% 2017 2018: 78.8% 2018 2019: 73.2% 2019 2020: 90.0% 2020 2021: 98.3% 2021 2022: 93.0% 2022 2023: 91.7% 2023 2024: 90.2% 2024 2025: 57.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200826830.8%
2009211152.4%
2010261142.3%
2011442965.9%
2012434093.0%
2013412765.9%
2014433581.4%
2015342676.5%
2016494081.6%
2017342264.7%
2018524178.8%
2019413073.2%
2020504590.0%
2021595898.3%
2022575393.0%
2023363391.7%
2024514690.2%
2025382257.9%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 759 12.8% 21.2% 41.9% 20.3%
Action 2 470 10.2% 10.9% 54.5% 19.8%
Action 3 249 8.8% 7.6% 66.3% 15.7%
Action 4 155 3.9% 7.7% 71.6% 14.8%
Action 5 82 4.9% 4.9% 79.3% 9.8%
Action 6 54 3.7% 3.7% 83.3% 3.7%
Action 7 35 0.0% 8.6% 82.9% 8.6%
Action 8 20 0.0% 5.0% 90.0% 5.0%
Action 9 14 7.1% 0.0% 92.9% 0.0%
Action 10 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 43.3% 93 of 215 office actions
All years 9.7% 180 of 1,858 office actions
Change +33.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
2.2%
1.4%
2014: Alice
3.6%
1.1%
6.2%
9.3%
33.0%
2019: PEG
2.9%
4.6%
4.0%
0.0%
38.6%
2024: AI examples
53.4%
2025: August memo
33.9%
22.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 30, 2015 12/854,521 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 4, 2014 11/472,495 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jul. 31, 2013 10/594,124 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 15, 2012 11/055,750 Reversed §103
May. 5, 2010 11/238,129 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.