Examiner Daniel Kinsaul

Grant ratio: 64.3% (65th percentile in Art Unit 2165 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.72. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2016
Grant ratio 64.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.72
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86240
Primary art unit
2165
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
213
Granted applications
137

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.5% 2.59
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.68 571 office actions across 213 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 213 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 60 28.2%
2 OAs 58 27.2%
3 OAs 37 17.4%
4 OAs 31 14.6%
5+ OAs 27 12.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 56.0% 2009 2010: 62.5% 2010 2011: 55.9% 2011 2012: 78.8% 2012 2013: 73.1% 2013 2014: 65.6% 2014 2015: 60.7% 2015 2016: 33.3% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009251456.0%
2010322062.5%
2011341955.9%
2012332678.8%
2013261973.1%
2014322165.6%
2015281760.7%
20163133.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 213 0.0% 5.2% 78.9% 0.9%
Action 2 153 0.7% 3.9% 90.2% 0.7%
Action 3 95 0.0% 1.1% 93.7% 2.1%
Action 4 58 0.0% 1.7% 91.4% 5.2%
Action 5 27 0.0% 0.0% 96.3% 3.7%
Action 6 13 0.0% 7.7% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 7 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.2% 1 of 571 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 7, 2015 13/110,440 Affirmed in part N/A
Jun. 24, 2015 12/001,229 Affirmed §103
Mar. 27, 2015 12/707,128 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 16, 2015 12/260,053 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.