Examiner Richard Bowen

Grant ratio: 75.3% (87th percentile in Art Unit 2165 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 75.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.00
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87075
Primary art unit
2165
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
563
Granted applications
424
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5982
Supervisor
Aleksandr Kerzhner
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1760

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.5% 2.59
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.08 1,173 office actions across 563 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 562 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 270 48.0%
2 OAs 132 23.4%
3 OAs 79 14.0%
4 OAs 39 6.9%
5+ OAs 42 7.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 20.0% 2010 2011: 60.6% 2011 2012: 73.9% 2012 2013: 65.6% 2013 2014: 89.5% 2014 2015: 85.4% 2015 2016: 84.8% 2016 2017: 70.7% 2017 2018: 62.2% 2018 2019: 86.0% 2019 2020: 91.2% 2020 2021: 95.1% 2021 2022: 85.4% 2022 2023: 82.4% 2023 2024: 78.3% 2024 2025: 53.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20105120.0%
2011332060.6%
2012231773.9%
2013322165.6%
2014383489.5%
2015413585.4%
2016463984.8%
2017412970.7%
2018372362.2%
2019433786.0%
2020343191.2%
2021413995.1%
2022413585.4%
2023342882.4%
2024231878.3%
2025321753.1%
20261900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 562 2.1% 8.4% 82.9% 1.1%
Action 2 292 6.8% 3.4% 88.0% 1.4%
Action 3 160 8.8% 3.1% 85.0% 1.9%
Action 4 81 11.1% 2.5% 85.2% 1.2%
Action 5 42 7.1% 0.0% 90.5% 2.4%
Action 6 21 4.8% 4.8% 81.0% 9.5%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 37.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 17.8% 24 of 135 office actions
All years 5.0% 59 of 1,173 office actions
Change +12.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
1.1%
15.1%
7.7%
2019: PEG
1.2%
1.4%
5.0%
3.9%
12.1%
2024: AI examples
20.0%
2025: August memo
20.8%
4.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 19, 2025 17/463,916 Reversed §101
Feb. 2, 2022 14/824,994 Affirmed §103
Mar. 27, 2019 14/081,952 Affirmed §103
Jun. 15, 2018 14/247,424 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 15, 2018 14/607,633 Affirmed §101 · §103
Dec. 14, 2017 13/605,227 Reversed §103
Mar. 1, 2016 12/183,316 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.