Examiner Tyler Torgrimson

Grant ratio: 68.3% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2165 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88547
Primary art unit
2165
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
416
Granted applications
284
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5550
Supervisor
Aleksander Kerzhner
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-1760

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 55.5% 2.59
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.44 1,015 office actions across 416 applications
Applications with office actions 95.9% 399 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 17 4.1%
1 OA 165 39.7%
2 OAs 95 22.8%
3 OAs 45 10.8%
4 OAs 37 8.9%
5+ OAs 57 13.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 36.4% 2012 2013: 61.9% 2013 2014: 30.8% 2014 2015: 57.1% 2015 2016: 82.4% 2016 2017: 80.8% 2017 2018: 63.2% 2018 2019: 84.0% 2019 2020: 71.0% 2020 2021: 85.7% 2021 2022: 72.2% 2022 2023: 88.5% 2023 2024: 68.3% 2024 2025: 69.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201211436.4%
2013211361.9%
201413430.8%
2015211257.1%
2016514282.4%
2017262180.8%
2018382463.2%
2019252184.0%
2020312271.0%
2021282485.7%
2022362672.2%
2023262388.5%
2024412868.3%
2025292069.0%
20261900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 399 15.3% 11.8% 56.4% 13.0%
Action 2 234 13.7% 18.8% 56.8% 9.8%
Action 3 139 10.1% 10.8% 68.3% 9.4%
Action 4 94 8.5% 10.6% 69.1% 9.6%
Action 5 57 5.3% 1.8% 87.7% 5.3%
Action 6 38 15.8% 0.0% 76.3% 7.9%
Action 7 23 26.1% 4.3% 60.9% 8.7%
Action 8 15 13.3% 6.7% 73.3% 6.7%
Action 9 9 22.2% 0.0% 66.7% 11.1%
Action 10 4 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 30.0% 54 of 180 office actions
All years 13.4% 136 of 1,015 office actions
Change +16.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.4%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
4.8%
16.9%
14.8%
35.6%
2019: PEG
4.3%
9.3%
14.8%
13.3%
14.9%
2024: AI examples
26.9%
2025: August memo
32.1%
50.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 22, 2026 17/363,515 Rehearing Decision – Denied §101
Jul. 2, 2021 14/053,395 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §120
Dec. 28, 2020 14/055,530 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 21, 2020 13/111,635 Affirmed §101
Jan. 31, 2019 12/955,768 Reversed §101
Nov. 9, 2018 12/950,213 Reversed N/A
Sep. 27, 2018 12/872,779 Affirmed §101
Oct. 17, 2016 13/760,661 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.