Examiner Sangwoo Ahn

Grant ratio: 64.6% (57th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.83. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2017
Grant ratio 64.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.83
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81652
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
288
Granted applications
186

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.85 828 office actions across 291 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 291 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 80 27.5%
2 OAs 81 27.8%
3 OAs 41 14.1%
4 OAs 40 13.7%
5+ OAs 49 16.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 36.8% 2008 2009: 37.9% 2009 2010: 76.0% 2010 2011: 63.3% 2011 2012: 68.0% 2012 2013: 77.8% 2013 2014: 68.6% 2014 2015: 64.9% 2015 2016: 70.6% 2016 2017: 72.2% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200819736.8%
2009291137.9%
2010251976.0%
2011301963.3%
2012251768.0%
2013362877.8%
2014352468.6%
2015372464.9%
2016342470.6%
2017181372.2%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 291 3.1% 22.0% 72.5% 1.0%
Action 2 211 1.9% 12.8% 83.9% 0.5%
Action 3 130 2.3% 9.2% 88.5% 0.0%
Action 4 89 3.4% 5.6% 87.6% 0.0%
Action 5 49 0.0% 4.1% 89.8% 0.0%
Action 6 24 0.0% 4.2% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 12.5% 62.5% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 2.3% 19 of 828 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.0%
2.5%
1.2%
2.2%
3.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
2.7%
4.2%
1.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 2/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
16.7% 2/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
25.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 18, 2019 12/239,596 Affirmed §103
Sep. 25, 2018 13/069,526 Affirmed §101 · §103
May. 31, 2018 13/287,118 Affirmed §103
May. 3, 2016 12/845,853 Reversed §101 · §103
Mar. 29, 2016 13/290,866 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2016 13/275,078 Affirmed §103
Jan. 7, 2015 11/943,284 Affirmed §103
Jun. 20, 2013 10/652,739 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 16, 2013 11/219,545 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 15, 2013 10/679,312 Reversed N/A
Aug. 24, 2012 09/946,009 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jun. 26, 2012 10/771,172 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.