Examiner Johnese Johnson

Grant ratio: 62.4% (48th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.74. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 62.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.74
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82180
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
362
Granted applications
226

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.56 1,416 office actions across 398 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 398 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 98 24.6%
2 OAs 74 18.6%
3 OAs 53 13.3%
4 OAs 60 15.1%
5+ OAs 113 28.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 56.5% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 63.0% 2010 2011: 62.1% 2011 2012: 65.0% 2012 2013: 85.0% 2013 2014: 73.0% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 31.3% 2016 2017: 42.9% 2017 2018: 73.0% 2018 2019: 78.6% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008231356.5%
2009241250.0%
2010271763.0%
2011291862.1%
2012201365.0%
2013403485.0%
2014372773.0%
201514750.0%
2016481531.3%
201721942.9%
2018372773.0%
2019282278.6%
2020141285.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 398 1.5% 42.0% 53.8% 0.5%
Action 2 300 1.3% 29.3% 68.3% 0.3%
Action 3 226 3.1% 16.8% 78.8% 0.0%
Action 4 173 3.5% 16.8% 78.6% 0.0%
Action 5 113 1.8% 14.2% 82.3% 0.9%
Action 6 71 2.8% 5.6% 90.1% 1.4%
Action 7 52 7.7% 3.8% 86.5% 0.0%
Action 8 35 2.9% 8.6% 85.7% 2.9%
Action 9 23 4.3% 8.7% 82.6% 4.3%
Action 10 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 2.3% 33 of 1,416 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
5.7%
2014: Alice
7.8%
4.6%
1.1%
1.6%
4.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 11 reversed.

Full reversal rate
64.7% 11/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
76.5% 13/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.8 months
New grounds of rejection
3
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 28, 2021 13/797,128 Reversed §103
Feb. 22, 2021 12/579,404 Affirmed §103
Aug. 11, 2020 12/500,756 Affirmed in part §103 · §112 · §120
Jul. 28, 2016 13/019,295 Reversed §103
Nov. 25, 2015 12/243,265 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Aug. 26, 2015 10/888,365 Reversed N/A
Aug. 10, 2015 11/615,477 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 30, 2014 10/913,143 Reversed N/A
Jul. 10, 2014 10/808,429 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2014 11/104,218 Reversed N/A
Apr. 25, 2014 11/230,019 Reversed §102
Dec. 13, 2013 11/097,679 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.