Examiner Amy Ng

Grant ratio: 67.1% (75th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2025
Grant ratio 67.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.36
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83260
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
210
Granted applications
141

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 507 office actions across 210 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 208 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 1.0%
1 OA 59 28.1%
2 OAs 65 31.0%
3 OAs 50 23.8%
4 OAs 22 10.5%
5+ OAs 12 5.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.0% 2008 2009: 67.5% 2009 2010: 76.0% 2010 2011: 81.8% 2011 2012: 73.3% 2012 2013: 66.7% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2016: 100.0% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017 2023: 100.0% 2023 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008201260.0%
2009402767.5%
2010251976.0%
2011443681.8%
2012453373.3%
2013151066.7%
20141500.0%
201611100.0%
20172150.0%
202322100.0%
2025100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 208 0.5% 9.1% 89.4% 0.0%
Action 2 149 0.7% 8.1% 91.3% 0.0%
Action 3 84 2.4% 10.7% 85.7% 1.2%
Action 4 34 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 5 12 0.0% 8.3% 91.7% 0.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 2 office actions
All years 0.8% 4 of 507 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.9%
1.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 25, 2018 13/004,743 Reversed N/A
Dec. 29, 2016 12/621,728 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 31, 2016 12/616,946 Affirmed §103
Mar. 22, 2016 11/864,859 Affirmed §103
Mar. 18, 2016 12/748,044 Affirmed §103
Sep. 4, 2015 12/621,166 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 7, 2012 11/565,449 Reversed N/A
Jan. 24, 2012 11/171,129 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.