Examiner Diedra M Mcquitery

Grant ratio: 66.6% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.28. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 66.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.28
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90953
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
356
Granted applications
237
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9607
Supervisor
Sanjiv Shah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4098

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.29 816 office actions across 356 applications
Applications with office actions 97.8% 348 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 2.2%
1 OA 164 46.1%
2 OAs 72 20.2%
3 OAs 30 8.4%
4 OAs 41 11.5%
5+ OAs 41 11.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 27.3% 2014 2015: 43.8% 2015 2016: 27.3% 2016 2017: 55.6% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 80.5% 2020 2021: 95.0% 2021 2022: 88.2% 2022 2023: 76.0% 2023 2024: 78.0% 2024 2025: 63.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201411327.3%
201516743.8%
201622627.3%
2017181055.6%
2018282175.0%
2019362466.7%
2020413380.5%
2021403895.0%
2022343088.2%
2023251976.0%
2024413278.0%
2025221463.6%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 348 12.4% 10.9% 53.7% 17.2%
Action 2 184 11.4% 3.3% 73.9% 9.2%
Action 3 112 4.5% 5.4% 83.0% 5.4%
Action 4 82 4.9% 2.4% 85.4% 7.3%
Action 5 41 7.3% 0.0% 87.8% 4.9%
Action 6 26 15.4% 0.0% 76.9% 7.7%
Action 7 11 45.5% 0.0% 54.5% 0.0%
Action 8 8 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 24.5% 35 of 143 office actions
All years 10.8% 88 of 816 office actions
Change +13.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
1.9%
3.0%
1.1%
4.7%
9.6%
2019: PEG
0.0%
11.8%
26.2%
14.8%
16.1%
2024: AI examples
30.0%
2025: August memo
24.1%
18.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 15, 2020 14/177,810 Reversed §103
Feb. 24, 2020 14/794,610 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Dec. 4, 2017 14/178,063 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Aug. 21, 2017 13/757,158 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 16, 2017 13/702,086 Affirmed §103 · §112 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.