Examiner Ranjit P Doraiswamy

Grant ratio: 53.2% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.32. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.32
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93120
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
203
Granted applications
108
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5759
Supervisor
Sanjiv Shah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4098

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.06 621 office actions across 203 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 203 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 28 13.8%
2 OAs 65 32.0%
3 OAs 38 18.7%
4 OAs 41 20.2%
5+ OAs 31 15.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 100.0% 2015 2017: 28.6% 2017 2018: 80.8% 2018 2019: 57.1% 2019 2020: 58.3% 2020 2021: 70.6% 2021 2022: 71.4% 2022 2023: 76.5% 2023 2024: 62.5% 2024 2025: 12.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201511100.0%
20177228.6%
2018262180.8%
2019211257.1%
2020241458.3%
2021171270.6%
2022211571.4%
2023171376.5%
2024241562.5%
202525312.0%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 203 0.0% 10.8% 87.7% 0.0%
Action 2 175 2.3% 5.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 3 110 4.5% 2.7% 90.9% 0.9%
Action 4 72 4.2% 2.8% 91.7% 1.4%
Action 5 31 3.2% 0.0% 93.5% 0.0%
Action 6 16 6.3% 0.0% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 7 6 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 8 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.3% 6 of 184 office actions
All years 2.6% 16 of 621 office actions
Change +0.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
6.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
8.1%
2025: August memo
1.6%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.6% 5/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.2 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 29, 2026 17/877,102 Affirmed §103
May. 20, 2026 17/918,127 Reversed N/A
May. 4, 2026 17/814,093 Affirmed §103
Oct. 27, 2025 17/302,058 Reversed §103
Sep. 19, 2025 18/495,617 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Jul. 20, 2023 16/727,327 Affirmed §103
Jun. 2, 2022 15/825,887 Reversed §102 · §103
Feb. 26, 2021 14/494,226 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 6, 2017 14/025,022 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.