Examiner Tony Wu

Grant ratio: 43.0% (11th percentile in Art Unit 2166 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.56. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 43.0%
Average office actions / grant 3.56
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93592
Primary art unit
2166
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
237
Granted applications
102
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2033
Supervisor
Sanjiv Shah
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4098

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 57.3% 2.82
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.41 808 office actions across 237 applications
Applications with office actions 99.6% 236 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.4%
1 OA 41 17.3%
2 OAs 58 24.5%
3 OAs 31 13.1%
4 OAs 47 19.8%
5+ OAs 59 24.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2016: 0.0% 2016 2017: 36.4% 2017 2018: 42.9% 2018 2019: 35.7% 2019 2020: 48.0% 2020 2021: 35.0% 2021 2022: 58.8% 2022 2023: 47.8% 2023 2024: 64.7% 2024 2025: 42.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2016100.0%
201711436.4%
201821942.9%
201914535.7%
2020251248.0%
202120735.0%
2022171058.8%
2023231147.8%
2024513364.7%
2025261142.3%
20262800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 236 0.4% 1.3% 95.3% 0.8%
Action 2 195 2.6% 0.5% 94.9% 1.0%
Action 3 137 4.4% 0.7% 92.7% 1.5%
Action 4 106 1.9% 0.0% 96.2% 1.9%
Action 5 59 5.1% 0.0% 93.2% 1.7%
Action 6 38 2.6% 0.0% 97.4% 0.0%
Action 7 18 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 5.6%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 90.9% 9.1%
Action 9 5 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 7.2% 17 of 237 office actions
All years 2.5% 20 of 808 office actions
Change +4.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.8%
2025: August memo
20.8%
7.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 30, 2022 14/976,638 Affirmed §103
Nov. 30, 2017 13/964,168 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.