Examiner Susan F. Rayyan

Grant ratio: 79.1% (86th percentile in Art Unit 2167 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2025
Grant ratio 79.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.07
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77889
Primary art unit
2167
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
297
Granted applications
235

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.0% 2.40
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 655 office actions across 302 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 302 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 117 38.7%
2 OAs 103 34.1%
3 OAs 36 11.9%
4 OAs 24 7.9%
5+ OAs 22 7.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 66.7% 2008 2009: 47.6% 2009 2010: 92.0% 2010 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 71.4% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 56.3% 2014 2015: 83.3% 2015 2016: 85.0% 2016 2017: 84.6% 2017 2018: 87.5% 2018 2019: 52.6% 2019 2020: 82.6% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 84.2% 2022 2023: 84.2% 2023 2024: 91.7% 2024 2025: 90.9% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20086466.7%
2009211047.6%
2010252392.0%
2011181583.3%
2012141071.4%
2013191684.2%
201416956.3%
2015121083.3%
2016201785.0%
2017131184.6%
2018161487.5%
2019191052.6%
2020231982.6%
20211414100.0%
2022191684.2%
2023191684.2%
2024121191.7%
2025111090.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 302 3.0% 16.6% 73.8% 1.0%
Action 2 185 22.2% 7.0% 55.7% 11.4%
Action 3 82 11.0% 6.1% 76.8% 1.2%
Action 4 46 6.5% 6.5% 65.2% 17.4%
Action 5 22 18.2% 9.1% 68.2% 4.5%
Action 6 12 25.0% 8.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 7 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
Action 8 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 14.0% 7 of 50 office actions
All years 10.8% 71 of 655 office actions
Change +3.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

11.5%
4.7%
11.4%
7.7%
2.2%
10.0%
2014: Alice
8.3%
8.8%
14.3%
14.6%
26.8%
2019: PEG
15.8%
11.9%
4.2%
2.8%
7.1%
2024: AI examples
15.4%
2025: August memo
18.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 11, 2025 17/515,635 Affirmed §101 · §112
Oct. 31, 2023 16/390,613 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 2, 2021 13/993,419 Affirmed §101
Jun. 26, 2019 14/225,714 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 17, 2017 13/326,928 Affirmed §103
Jan. 7, 2015 11/620,380 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 19, 2014 12/042,945 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 25, 2013 10/123,634 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.