Examiner Sherief Badawi

Grant ratio: 53.1% (14th percentile in Art Unit 2167 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 53.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.88
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82894
Primary art unit
2167
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
209
Granted applications
111
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9782

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.0% 2.40
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.73 570 office actions across 209 applications
Applications with office actions 96.7% 202 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 3.3%
1 OA 54 25.8%
2 OAs 56 26.8%
3 OAs 35 16.7%
4 OAs 22 10.5%
5+ OAs 35 16.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.8% 2008 2009: 59.5% 2009 2010: 62.5% 2010 2011: 55.0% 2011 2012: 72.0% 2012 2013: 63.6% 2013 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2020: 83.3% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008241145.8%
2009422559.5%
2010241562.5%
2011402255.0%
2012251872.0%
2013221463.6%
2015100.0%
2016400.0%
20206583.3%
202111100.0%
2025400.0%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 202 1.5% 12.4% 83.7% 1.5%
Action 2 148 2.7% 8.1% 87.8% 1.4%
Action 3 92 4.3% 4.3% 91.3% 0.0%
Action 4 57 0.0% 1.8% 96.5% 0.0%
Action 5 35 0.0% 2.9% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 6 20 0.0% 5.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 11.1%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.4% 1 of 29 office actions
All years 1.9% 11 of 570 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.7%
2.1%
1.1%
1.0%
5.3%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
6.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 23, 2015 12/145,313 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 27, 2015 11/397,592 Affirmed N/A
May. 23, 2014 10/742,832 Reversed N/A
Feb. 28, 2013 11/046,243 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 11/046,595 Affirmed §103
Jul. 30, 2012 11/091,790 Reversed §103
May. 17, 2012 10/904,304 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 23, 2011 11/293,576 Reversed §103
Nov. 29, 2011 11/222,881 Affirmed §103
Nov. 22, 2011 11/111,508 Affirmed §101 · §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.