Examiner Hexing Liu

Grant ratio: 64.9% (25th percentile in Art Unit 2167 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.14. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2016
Grant ratio 64.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.14
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83123
Primary art unit
2167
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
188
Granted applications
122

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.0% 2.40
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.04 571 office actions across 188 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 188 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 49 26.1%
2 OAs 45 23.9%
3 OAs 27 14.4%
4 OAs 31 16.5%
5+ OAs 36 19.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 10.0% 2008 2009: 38.5% 2009 2010: 69.2% 2010 2011: 20.0% 2011 2012: 76.5% 2012 2013: 69.0% 2013 2014: 73.7% 2014 2015: 90.0% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200810110.0%
2009261038.5%
2010261869.2%
201110220.0%
2012342676.5%
2013292069.0%
2014191473.7%
2015302790.0%
201644100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 188 0.5% 5.3% 87.8% 1.6%
Action 2 139 6.5% 2.9% 87.8% 1.4%
Action 3 94 5.3% 1.1% 92.6% 1.1%
Action 4 67 4.5% 1.5% 86.6% 3.0%
Action 5 36 0.0% 0.0% 97.2% 2.8%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 3.2% 18 of 571 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.1%
7.3%
6.7%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
45.5% 5/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
54.5% 6/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2016 12/838,405 Reversed §103
Mar. 24, 2016 12/193,803 Affirmed §103
Oct. 22, 2015 12/111,150 Reversed N/A
Jan. 21, 2015 11/364,959 Affirmed §103 · §120
Apr. 9, 2014 11/474,898 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 11, 2014 11/104,046 Reversed N/A
Dec. 30, 2013 10/965,124 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 24, 2013 11/061,225 Reversed §103
Sep. 9, 2013 10/964,694 Affirmed New ground of rejection N/A
Jul. 31, 2013 11/172,733 Affirmed §103 · §112
Oct. 16, 2012 11/165,342 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.