Examiner Susan Chen

Grant ratio: 76.8% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2168 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.42. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2018
Grant ratio 76.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.42
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
77723
Primary art unit
2168
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
423
Granted applications
325

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 62.2% 2.51
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.40 1,072 office actions across 446 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 446 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 146 32.7%
2 OAs 142 31.8%
3 OAs 82 18.4%
4 OAs 36 8.1%
5+ OAs 40 9.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 51.4% 2008 2009: 75.6% 2009 2010: 76.9% 2010 2011: 86.0% 2011 2012: 84.2% 2012 2013: 87.5% 2013 2014: 79.2% 2014 2015: 80.9% 2015 2016: 75.6% 2016 2017: 64.3% 2017 2018: 73.7% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008351851.4%
2009413175.6%
2010393076.9%
2011433786.0%
2012383284.2%
2013403587.5%
2014483879.2%
2015473880.9%
2016453475.6%
2017281864.3%
2018191473.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 446 1.8% 46.2% 45.5% 5.2%
Action 2 300 7.3% 29.3% 47.0% 10.0%
Action 3 158 5.1% 19.6% 60.8% 8.2%
Action 4 76 2.6% 17.1% 61.8% 6.6%
Action 5 40 2.5% 12.5% 70.0% 10.0%
Action 6 26 11.5% 11.5% 57.7% 7.7%
Action 7 13 0.0% 15.4% 69.2% 0.0%
Action 8 6 16.7% 33.3% 33.3% 16.7%
Action 9 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 4.2% 45 of 1,072 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.0%
1.1%
3.0%
0.9%
3.4%
0.9%
2014: Alice
6.3%
8.7%
2.1%
12.8%
5.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 24. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 13 reversed.

Full reversal rate
54.2% 13/24 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
70.8% 17/24 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 6, 2020 15/090,754 Reversed §103 · §112
Sep. 24, 2019 14/546,907 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Nov. 28, 2016 13/172,573 Reversed §103
Sep. 28, 2016 13/897,713 Affirmed §102 · §103
Sep. 23, 2016 13/421,062 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jul. 25, 2016 13/421,588 Reversed §102 · §112
May. 17, 2016 13/250,716 Reversed §102
Mar. 1, 2016 12/715,266 Affirmed §102 · §112
Jan. 20, 2016 13/172,039 Reversed N/A
Dec. 30, 2015 13/172,425 Reversed §103
Dec. 18, 2015 12/925,809 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 19, 2015 12/180,417 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.