Examiner Jau-Shya Meng

Grant ratio: 74.8% (71st percentile in Art Unit 2168 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.53. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.53
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83192
Primary art unit
2168
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
584
Granted applications
437
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1634
Supervisor
Charles Rones
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4085

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 62.2% 2.51
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 1,491 office actions across 584 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 576 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.4%
1 OA 206 35.3%
2 OAs 147 25.2%
3 OAs 79 13.5%
4 OAs 70 12.0%
5+ OAs 74 12.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 71.9% 2009 2010: 52.6% 2010 2011: 67.9% 2011 2012: 68.2% 2012 2013: 73.9% 2013 2014: 60.6% 2014 2015: 61.9% 2015 2016: 80.9% 2016 2017: 80.0% 2017 2018: 79.5% 2018 2019: 81.8% 2019 2020: 92.1% 2020 2021: 93.2% 2021 2022: 97.5% 2022 2023: 87.9% 2023 2024: 96.9% 2024 2025: 64.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200815533.3%
2009322371.9%
2010191052.6%
2011281967.9%
2012221568.2%
2013231773.9%
2014332060.6%
2015211361.9%
2016473880.9%
2017352880.0%
2018393179.5%
2019332781.8%
2020383592.1%
2021444193.2%
2022403997.5%
2023332987.9%
2024323196.9%
2025251664.0%
20262500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 576 4.2% 4.2% 83.0% 0.9%
Action 2 370 1.6% 0.8% 91.1% 1.6%
Action 3 223 1.3% 2.2% 91.9% 1.3%
Action 4 144 2.1% 0.0% 89.6% 2.1%
Action 5 74 2.7% 1.4% 93.2% 0.0%
Action 6 51 2.0% 2.0% 90.2% 2.0%
Action 7 31 0.0% 0.0% 96.8% 0.0%
Action 8 14 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 10.7% 15 of 140 office actions
All years 2.7% 41 of 1,491 office actions
Change +8.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.9%
1.8%
3.4%
3.9%
2019: PEG
7.6%
2.2%
1.3%
2.9%
5.8%
2024: AI examples
12.5%
2025: August memo
5.4%
12.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 1, 2020 13/336,087 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 18, 2016 11/289,554 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 26, 2015 12/828,139 Affirmed in part N/A
Jul. 16, 2015 12/345,764 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 22, 2015 11/837,846 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 17, 2015 12/333,261 Affirmed §101 · §103
May. 31, 2011 10/857,172 Reversed §102
May. 19, 2011 11/016,202 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.