AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Xiaoqin Hu

Examiner Xiaoqin Hu appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 51.9%, they average 2.60 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.60
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-1792
Predicted Supervisor
N/A
Supervisor Phone
N/A
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2160 - Databases and File Management

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
212
Granted Applications
110
Non-Granted Applications
102
Avg OA / Grant
2.60
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2168
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 51.9% 2.60
Art Unit 19 63.1% 2.51
Group 193 61.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 3 0 0.0%
2019 27 15 55.6%
2020 27 17 63.0%
2021 35 26 74.3%
2022 17 11 64.7%
2023 25 12 48.0%
2024 31 20 64.5%
2025 29 9 31.0%
2026 18 0 0.0%

110 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 212 0.9% 7.5% 87.7% 2.8%
2 138 5.1% 5.1% 86.2% 3.6%
3 95 6.3% 4.2% 85.3% 4.2%
4 63 4.8% 1.6% 85.7% 7.9%
5 31 9.7% 3.2% 83.9% 3.2%
6 17 17.6% 0.0% 82.4% 0.0%
7 7 14.3% 0.0% 71.4% 14.3%
8 5 20.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
9 2 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0%
10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
4.8%
2018
1.1%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
3.2%
2022
4.6%
2023
8.5%
2024
15.5%
2025
27.8%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.