Examiner Raquel Perez-Arroyo

Grant ratio: 48.1% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2169 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.19. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 48.1%
Average office actions / grant 3.19
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90587
Primary art unit
2169
Work group
2160
Technology center
2100
Applications
337
Granted applications
162
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8969
Supervisor
Sherief Badawi
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9782

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 55.6% 2.66
Group 196 60.2% 2.52
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.19 1,075 office actions across 337 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 335 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.6%
1 OA 77 22.8%
2 OAs 74 22.0%
3 OAs 52 15.4%
4 OAs 62 18.4%
5+ OAs 70 20.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 61.5% 2014 2015: 57.9% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 48.0% 2017 2018: 64.3% 2018 2019: 70.0% 2019 2020: 62.5% 2020 2021: 54.2% 2021 2022: 50.0% 2022 2023: 56.0% 2023 2024: 63.3% 2024 2025: 24.1% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201413861.5%
2015191157.9%
2016281450.0%
2017251248.0%
2018281864.3%
2019201470.0%
2020241562.5%
2021241354.2%
2022341750.0%
2023251456.0%
2024301963.3%
202529724.1%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 335 2.7% 6.3% 86.3% 0.6%
Action 2 258 7.8% 1.9% 87.6% 1.9%
Action 3 184 10.3% 0.0% 87.5% 2.2%
Action 4 132 15.2% 0.0% 84.8% 0.8%
Action 5 70 11.4% 0.0% 85.7% 2.9%
Action 6 46 17.4% 0.0% 78.3% 2.2%
Action 7 25 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 16 18.8% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 20.0% 0.0% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 11.0% 27 of 245 office actions
All years 8.7% 93 of 1,075 office actions
Change +2.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
66.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
20.7%
26.4%
2019: PEG
1.4%
6.3%
8.0%
6.9%
5.1%
2024: AI examples
9.9%
2025: August memo
11.4%
16.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
14.3% 1/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 23, 2022 15/902,771 Affirmed §103
Jul. 5, 2022 14/811,301 Reversed N/A
Jun. 27, 2019 14/531,855 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Sep. 26, 2017 13/741,909 Affirmed §103
Sep. 12, 2017 13/742,218 Affirmed §103
Jun. 23, 2017 14/135,100 Affirmed §103
Feb. 27, 2017 13/651,082 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.