Examiner William Trapanese

Grant ratio: 70.4% (77th percentile in Art Unit 2171 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87259
Primary art unit
2171
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
669
Granted applications
471
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3304
Supervisor
Davienne Monbleau
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1945

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 55.4% 2.52
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 1,566 office actions across 669 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 667 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 288 43.0%
2 OAs 147 22.0%
3 OAs 80 12.0%
4 OAs 79 11.8%
5+ OAs 73 10.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 7.7% 2011 2012: 16.7% 2012 2013: 40.9% 2013 2014: 57.1% 2014 2015: 70.0% 2015 2016: 74.3% 2016 2017: 71.7% 2017 2018: 82.1% 2018 2019: 83.7% 2019 2020: 89.3% 2020 2021: 85.7% 2021 2022: 85.1% 2022 2023: 91.3% 2023 2024: 97.4% 2024 2025: 83.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010200.0%
20111317.7%
201218316.7%
201322940.9%
2014492857.1%
2015503570.0%
2016352674.3%
2017533871.7%
2018393282.1%
2019494183.7%
2020565089.3%
2021564885.7%
2022474085.1%
2023464291.3%
2024383797.4%
2025494183.7%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 667 1.3% 28.8% 60.9% 0.3%
Action 2 379 1.1% 5.3% 89.2% 0.5%
Action 3 232 0.4% 3.4% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 4 152 0.7% 2.6% 96.1% 0.0%
Action 5 73 4.1% 2.7% 93.2% 0.0%
Action 6 31 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 2 of 167 office actions
All years 1.1% 18 of 1,566 office actions
Change +0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.8%
1.4%
0.8%
2.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
1.4%
6.7%
2024: AI examples
2.2%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 23, 2023 14/672,377 Affirmed §102 · §112
Oct. 2, 2019 13/659,767 Affirmed §101 · §103
Apr. 30, 2019 13/795,257 Affirmed §103
Aug. 28, 2017 12/610,219 Affirmed §102
Apr. 17, 2017 12/917,747 Affirmed §103
Oct. 14, 2016 13/283,981 Reversed N/A
Feb. 25, 2016 12/331,650 Affirmed in part §103
Jan. 16, 2015 11/971,721 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.