Examiner Daniel Samwel

Grant ratio: 62.8% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2171 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.99. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.99
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90515
Primary art unit
2171
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
382
Granted applications
240
Examiner phone
(313) 446-6549
Supervisor
Matthew Ell
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3264

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 55.4% 2.52
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 757 office actions across 382 applications
Applications with office actions 98.2% 375 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.8%
1 OA 193 50.5%
2 OAs 89 23.3%
3 OAs 47 12.3%
4 OAs 26 6.8%
5+ OAs 20 5.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 47.6% 2014 2015: 72.2% 2015 2016: 42.1% 2016 2017: 25.9% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2019: 68.2% 2019 2020: 70.7% 2020 2021: 85.2% 2021 2022: 92.1% 2022 2023: 88.9% 2023 2024: 92.9% 2024 2025: 52.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20132150.0%
2014211047.6%
2015181372.2%
201619842.1%
201727725.9%
2018201050.0%
2019221568.2%
2020412970.7%
2021272385.2%
2022383592.1%
2023363288.9%
2024423992.9%
2025341852.9%
20263500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 375 0.3% 9.9% 88.8% 0.5%
Action 2 182 0.5% 4.4% 92.9% 1.6%
Action 3 93 1.1% 4.3% 93.5% 0.0%
Action 4 46 2.2% 0.0% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 145 office actions
All years 0.5% 4 of 757 office actions
Change -0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
2.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
16.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 1, 2022 16/192,181 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 4, 2021 15/374,171 Affirmed §102 · §103
Oct. 28, 2016 13/547,705 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.