Examiner Asteway T. Gattew

Grant ratio: 51.4% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2173 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: September 2020
Grant ratio 51.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89260
Primary art unit
2173
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
181
Granted applications
93

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 48.8% 2.68
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.80 596 office actions across 213 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 213 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 63 29.6%
2 OAs 51 23.9%
3 OAs 35 16.4%
4 OAs 34 16.0%
5+ OAs 30 14.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 40.6% 2013 2014: 72.7% 2014 2015: 57.1% 2015 2016: 40.0% 2016 2017: 63.0% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2019: 54.8% 2019 2020: 57.9% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012700.0%
2013321340.6%
201411872.7%
2015211257.1%
201615640.0%
2017271763.0%
201818950.0%
2019311754.8%
2020191157.9%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 213 0.5% 10.8% 87.8% 0.5%
Action 2 150 0.7% 7.3% 91.3% 0.7%
Action 3 99 1.0% 3.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 4 64 3.1% 6.3% 90.6% 0.0%
Action 5 30 0.0% 0.0% 96.7% 0.0%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 5 of 596 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.4%
2014: Alice
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
22.2% 2/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.5 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 12, 2022 15/391,116 Affirmed in part §103 · §112 · §120
Jun. 15, 2022 15/638,046 Affirmed §102
Nov. 23, 2021 14/226,794 Affirmed §103
Aug. 28, 2019 12/902,219 Affirmed §103
Apr. 24, 2018 13/526,888 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 22, 2017 13/874,611 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2017 13/947,390 Reversed §102 · §103
Oct. 6, 2016 13/179,626 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 16, 2016 13/206,199 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.