AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Rami Rafat Okasha

Examiner Rami Rafat Okasha appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 51.8%, they average 2.34 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 2.34
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
9 years (2018-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-0675
Predicted Supervisor
Scott Baderman
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3644
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2170 - Graphical User Interface, Document Processing, Power, and Other

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
222
Granted Applications
115
Non-Granted Applications
107
Avg OA / Grant
2.34
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2118 , 2144 , 2173
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 51.8% 2.34
Art Unit 20 49.7% 2.68
Group 187 49.7% 2.74
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2018; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2018 7 0 0.0%
2019 26 9 34.6%
2020 21 10 47.6%
2021 23 9 39.1%
2022 25 15 60.0%
2023 28 24 85.7%
2024 37 29 78.4%
2025 39 19 48.7%
2026 16 0 0.0%

115 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 219 0.9% 5.5% 88.6% 4.6%
2 150 0.0% 0.0% 98.7% 1.3%
3 85 0.0% 2.4% 97.6% 0.0%
4 46 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.7%
2024
0.0%
2025
6.3%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.