AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Amelia Tapp

Appears inactive Last observed office action: March 2025 (15 months ago).

Examiner Amelia Tapp appears to be about average relative to their peer examiners. Their lifetime grant ratio is 68.2%, they average 2.36 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by §103 and occasional §101 rejections.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC About Average
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.36
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
18 years (2008-2025)
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2140 - Artificial Intelligence

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
444
Granted Applications
303
Non-Granted Applications
141
Avg OA / Grant
2.36
Last OA Observed
March 2025 (15 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2144 , 2176 , 2177 , 2179
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 68.2% 2.36
Art Unit 22 48.3% 2.41
Group 158 37.3% 2.41
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 35 15 42.9%
2009 34 22 64.7%
2010 29 20 69.0%
2011 35 21 60.0%
2012 19 13 68.4%
2013 11 7 63.6%
2014 21 12 57.1%
2015 27 12 44.4%
2016 32 22 68.8%
2017 46 35 76.1%
2018 23 20 87.0%
2019 16 9 56.3%
2020 33 28 84.8%
2021 14 12 85.7%
2022 10 9 90.0%
2023 15 12 80.0%
2024 38 30 78.9%
2025 6 4 66.7%
No observed data after 2025; examiner may have gone inactive or moved out of examining work.

303 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 455 2.4% 13.6% 82.4% 0.9%
2 299 5.7% 8.0% 84.3% 0.7%
3 159 3.8% 5.7% 86.2% 1.9%
4 107 1.9% 3.7% 92.5% 0.9%
5 51 2.0% 5.9% 90.2% 2.0%
6 29 3.4% 3.4% 89.7% 3.4%
7 16 6.3% 6.3% 87.5% 0.0%
8 6 16.7% 0.0% 83.3% 0.0%
9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
7.4%
2008
6.9%
2009
3.7%
2010
2.8%
2011
1.5%
2012
4.5%
2013
4.7%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
6.7%
2017
13.2%
2018
6.1%
2019
1.8%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.2%
2024
0.0%
2025

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.