Examiner Frank D. Mills

Grant ratio: 64.7% (73rd percentile in Art Unit 2176 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.16. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.16
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86756
Primary art unit
2176
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
635
Granted applications
411
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3172
Supervisor
Kevin Young
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3180

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 41.9% 2.85
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.23 1,430 office actions across 641 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 641 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 258 40.2%
2 OAs 189 29.5%
3 OAs 86 13.4%
4 OAs 50 7.8%
5+ OAs 58 9.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 35.7% 2009 2010: 75.0% 2010 2011: 74.2% 2011 2012: 54.1% 2012 2013: 81.3% 2013 2014: 74.4% 2014 2015: 54.8% 2015 2016: 63.3% 2016 2017: 63.3% 2017 2018: 75.8% 2018 2019: 61.5% 2019 2020: 61.5% 2020 2021: 82.9% 2021 2022: 70.7% 2022 2023: 79.2% 2023 2024: 78.7% 2024 2025: 41.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009281035.7%
2010362775.0%
2011312374.2%
2012372054.1%
2013322681.3%
2014433274.4%
2015311754.8%
2016301963.3%
2017301963.3%
2018332575.8%
2019392461.5%
2020392461.5%
2021352982.9%
2022412970.7%
2023483879.2%
2024473778.7%
2025291241.4%
20262600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 641 2.0% 3.7% 88.0% 3.1%
Action 2 383 3.9% 5.5% 86.9% 2.6%
Action 3 194 1.5% 2.1% 92.8% 2.6%
Action 4 108 1.9% 1.9% 90.7% 4.6%
Action 5 58 3.4% 3.4% 89.7% 3.4%
Action 6 26 0.0% 0.0% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 6.1% 11 of 180 office actions
All years 2.4% 35 of 1,430 office actions
Change +3.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

100.0%
0.0%
4.6%
2.9%
1.3%
1.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.8%
2.3%
2.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.1%
1.2%
5.6%
1.2%
2024: AI examples
4.2%
2025: August memo
10.9%
10.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.7 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 3, 2019 14/148,598 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §120
Feb. 28, 2019 14/142,376 Affirmed in part §103
Dec. 15, 2016 13/307,730 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 13/214,279 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 19, 2015 11/285,026 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 16, 2014 10/888,629 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
May. 5, 2014 10/977,271 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 13, 2014 11/316,771 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.