Examiner Andrew T Mcintosh

Grant ratio: 68.0% (83rd percentile in Art Unit 2176 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87584
Primary art unit
2176
Work group
2170
Technology center
2100
Applications
537
Granted applications
365
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7790
Supervisor
Tamara Kyle
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4241

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 41.9% 2.85
Group 190 48.6% 2.73
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.24 1,201 office actions across 537 applications
Applications with office actions 95.2% 511 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 26 4.8%
1 OA 186 34.6%
2 OAs 149 27.7%
3 OAs 71 13.2%
4 OAs 61 11.4%
5+ OAs 44 8.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 41.2% 2011 2012: 68.4% 2012 2013: 71.4% 2013 2014: 37.0% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 61.3% 2016 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 71.8% 2018 2019: 85.7% 2019 2020: 97.4% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 85.4% 2022 2023: 94.1% 2023 2024: 86.0% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201117741.2%
2012191368.4%
2013282071.4%
2014271037.0%
2015261350.0%
2016311961.3%
2017402460.0%
2018392871.8%
2019353085.7%
2020383797.4%
2021292689.7%
2022484185.4%
2023514894.1%
2024433786.0%
2025301240.0%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 511 1.6% 5.9% 86.3% 0.8%
Action 2 325 3.1% 8.6% 83.4% 1.5%
Action 3 176 2.3% 2.8% 93.2% 1.1%
Action 4 105 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 0.0%
Action 5 44 0.0% 4.5% 95.5% 0.0%
Action 6 24 0.0% 8.3% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 3 of 194 office actions
All years 1.8% 22 of 1,201 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.8%
2.7%
6.2%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.2%
2.2%
0.9%
3.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
3.9%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
2.0%
2.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 7, 2021 15/581,038 Reversed §103
Jan. 25, 2021 14/024,273 Reversed §103
Oct. 18, 2017 13/561,504 Reversed §102
Sep. 13, 2017 13/400,545 Affirmed §103
Apr. 28, 2017 13/657,813 Affirmed in part §103
Mar. 31, 2017 12/915,181 Affirmed §103
May. 31, 2016 13/052,622 Affirmed §103
Feb. 17, 2016 13/052,421 Affirmed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.