Examiner Matthew Sandifer

Grant ratio: 76.6% (76th percentile in Art Unit 2182 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.66
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86650
Primary art unit
2182
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
641
Granted applications
491
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5175
Supervisor
Andrew Caldwell
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3702

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 45.2% 1.65
Group 178 52.5% 1.89
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.68 1,078 office actions across 641 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 634 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.1%
1 OA 370 57.7%
2 OAs 172 26.8%
3 OAs 42 6.6%
4 OAs 29 4.5%
5+ OAs 21 3.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 56.3% 2009 2010: 67.5% 2010 2011: 46.4% 2011 2012: 59.4% 2012 2013: 77.4% 2013 2014: 66.0% 2014 2015: 74.2% 2015 2016: 78.7% 2016 2017: 95.7% 2017 2018: 83.8% 2018 2019: 95.2% 2019 2020: 90.5% 2020 2021: 92.7% 2021 2022: 82.5% 2022 2023: 84.2% 2023 2024: 82.9% 2024 2025: 68.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200916956.3%
2010402767.5%
2011281346.4%
2012321959.4%
2013312477.4%
2014473166.0%
2015312374.2%
2016473778.7%
2017474595.7%
2018373183.8%
2019424095.2%
2020423890.5%
2021413892.7%
2022403382.5%
2023383284.2%
2024413482.9%
2025251768.0%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 634 24.0% 7.4% 45.1% 20.7%
Action 2 264 25.8% 8.3% 48.9% 15.2%
Action 3 92 20.7% 4.3% 64.1% 10.9%
Action 4 50 16.0% 6.0% 70.0% 8.0%
Action 5 21 14.3% 0.0% 66.7% 14.3%
Action 6 12 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0%
Action 7 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 8 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 32.0% 40 of 125 office actions
All years 23.5% 253 of 1,078 office actions
Change +8.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.3%
2.1%
9.2%
3.9%
12.0%
2014: Alice
10.3%
35.8%
42.4%
37.3%
42.1%
2019: PEG
33.3%
30.0%
32.3%
36.7%
28.6%
2024: AI examples
37.7%
2025: August memo
20.0%
23.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
19.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 19, 2026 18/135,715 Reversed §101
Aug. 31, 2023 16/375,307 Reversed §101
Sep. 2, 2022 16/694,915 Affirmed §101
Feb. 23, 2016 11/526,122 Affirmed §103
Mar. 3, 2015 11/849,272 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 30, 2014 11/381,870 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.