Examiner Jyoti Mehta

Grant ratio: 62.2% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2182 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.51
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90256
Primary art unit
2182
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
241
Granted applications
150
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3995
Supervisor
John Cottingham
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1400

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 45.2% 1.65
Group 178 52.5% 1.89
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.89 696 office actions across 241 applications
Applications with office actions 96.7% 233 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 3.3%
1 OA 47 19.5%
2 OAs 77 32.0%
3 OAs 34 14.1%
4 OAs 41 17.0%
5+ OAs 34 14.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 50.0% 2013 2014: 45.5% 2014 2015: 68.8% 2015 2016: 67.9% 2016 2017: 60.0% 2017 2018: 65.5% 2018 2019: 51.7% 2019 2020: 69.2% 2020 2021: 92.6% 2021 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20138450.0%
2014221045.5%
2015322268.8%
2016281967.9%
2017301860.0%
2018291965.5%
2019291551.7%
2020261869.2%
2021272592.6%
2025300.0%
2026700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 233 2.1% 4.7% 80.3% 9.9%
Action 2 186 6.5% 6.5% 62.4% 21.0%
Action 3 109 9.2% 0.9% 73.4% 12.8%
Action 4 75 9.3% 4.0% 62.7% 21.3%
Action 5 34 17.6% 2.9% 50.0% 26.5%
Action 6 27 3.7% 3.7% 48.1% 44.4%
Action 7 12 0.0% 8.3% 50.0% 33.3%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 42.9%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 10 3 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 42.9% 6 of 14 office actions
All years 6.2% 43 of 696 office actions
Change +36.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.0%
2014: Alice
3.0%
3.3%
3.2%
8.8%
9.7%
2019: PEG
10.8%
3.8%
0.0%
2025: August memo
42.9%
42.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
20.0% 1/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.0 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 30, 2021 15/873,089 Reversed New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Oct. 30, 2018 13/789,467 Affirmed §103
Oct. 27, 2017 13/340,679 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Oct. 17, 2017 13/543,673 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 26, 2017 13/077,424 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.