Examiner Benjamin Geib

Grant ratio: 87.2% (93rd percentile in Art Unit 2183 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.04. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2025
Grant ratio 87.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.04
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81218
Primary art unit
2183
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
555
Granted applications
484

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 33 58.1% 2.00
Group 178 52.5% 1.89
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.06 1,167 office actions across 566 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 566 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 274 48.4%
2 OAs 134 23.7%
3 OAs 81 14.3%
4 OAs 37 6.5%
5+ OAs 40 7.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 72.7% 2008 2009: 72.4% 2009 2010: 96.8% 2010 2011: 90.5% 2011 2012: 88.2% 2012 2013: 84.4% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 87.8% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2017: 85.3% 2017 2018: 90.9% 2018 2019: 89.5% 2019 2020: 86.7% 2020 2021: 95.8% 2021 2022: 96.8% 2022 2023: 79.2% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 41.7% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008332472.7%
2009292172.4%
2010313096.8%
2011211990.5%
2012343088.2%
2013322784.4%
2014322887.5%
2015494387.8%
20164242100.0%
2017342985.3%
2018333090.9%
2019191789.5%
2020302686.7%
2021484695.8%
2022313096.8%
2023241979.2%
2024211885.7%
202512541.7%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 566 3.7% 25.1% 57.8% 6.0%
Action 2 292 3.4% 21.9% 64.7% 3.4%
Action 3 158 4.4% 20.9% 69.6% 2.5%
Action 4 77 2.6% 14.3% 79.2% 2.6%
Action 5 40 5.0% 7.5% 75.0% 10.0%
Action 6 17 5.9% 11.8% 70.6% 11.8%
Action 7 7 0.0% 28.6% 71.4% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 24.0% 24 of 100 office actions
All years 3.7% 43 of 1,167 office actions
Change +20.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.0%
2.4%
2014: Alice
2.6%
2.3%
1.4%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.7%
3.5%
2.0%
9.1%
2024: AI examples
28.1%
2025: August memo
26.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 23, 2016 12/261,386 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 16, 2015 11/568,714 Reversed N/A
Mar. 30, 2015 11/733,978 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 7, 2014 12/215,760 Reversed N/A
Mar. 27, 2012 11/011,049 Affirmed §102
Dec. 30, 2011 11/555,513 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.