Examiner Samuel Dillon

Grant ratio: 54.4% (13th percentile in Art Unit 2185 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.64. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2014
Grant ratio 54.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.64
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81873
Primary art unit
2185
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
149
Granted applications
81

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 13 70.5% 1.87
Group 186 49.9% 1.89
Tech Center 1,817 51.4% 2.19
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.48 519 office actions across 149 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 149 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 26 17.4%
2 OAs 31 20.8%
3 OAs 23 15.4%
4 OAs 25 16.8%
5+ OAs 44 29.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 26.7% 2008 2009: 42.3% 2009 2010: 51.6% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 46.2% 2012 2013: 78.3% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200815426.7%
2009261142.3%
2010311651.6%
2011241666.7%
2012261246.2%
2013231878.3%
201444100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 149 0.0% 8.7% 77.2% 0.0%
Action 2 123 0.0% 11.4% 82.9% 0.8%
Action 3 92 0.0% 2.2% 91.3% 2.2%
Action 4 69 0.0% 4.3% 89.9% 0.0%
Action 5 44 0.0% 4.5% 93.2% 2.3%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 4.8%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 519 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 11, 2014 11/759,685 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jan. 27, 2014 11/011,861 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 22, 2013 11/113,831 Reversed N/A
Oct. 16, 2013 11/618,822 Affirmed §103
Aug. 8, 2012 10/756,534 Reversed §103
Mar. 27, 2012 10/684,207 Affirmed §103
Mar. 2, 2012 10/756,535 Affirmed in part N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.