Examiner Matthew R. Chrzanowski

Grant ratio: 60.7% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2186 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.39. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: January 2016
Grant ratio 60.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.39
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82461
Primary art unit
2186
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
140
Granted applications
85

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 15 42.0% 2.03
Group 184 50.6% 1.89
Tech Center 1,807 51.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.48 347 office actions across 140 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 140 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 47 33.6%
2 OAs 44 31.4%
3 OAs 18 12.9%
4 OAs 17 12.1%
5+ OAs 14 10.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 33.3% 2009 2010: 75.0% 2010 2011: 64.7% 2011 2012: 77.3% 2012 2013: 45.0% 2013 2014: 69.2% 2014 2015: 77.8% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200812650.0%
200921733.3%
2010241875.0%
2011171164.7%
2012221777.3%
201320945.0%
201413969.2%
20159777.8%
20162150.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 140 0.7% 10.7% 76.4% 9.3%
Action 2 93 0.0% 7.5% 82.8% 8.6%
Action 3 49 0.0% 8.2% 85.7% 6.1%
Action 4 31 0.0% 3.2% 87.1% 6.5%
Action 5 14 0.0% 0.0% 92.9% 7.1%
Action 6 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 66.7%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 1 of 347 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 17, 2016 12/831,441 Affirmed §103
Jan. 26, 2015 12/348,075 Reversed N/A
Feb. 25, 2014 10/519,394 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 29, 2013 12/049,307 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 30, 2011 11/274,541 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 5, 2011 10/955,184 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.