Examiner Jared Rutz

Grant ratio: 77.2% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2187 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.78
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81153
Primary art unit
2187
Work group
2180
Technology center
2100
Applications
316
Granted applications
244
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5535
Supervisor
John Cottingham
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1400

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 46.7% 1.83
Group 178 52.5% 1.89
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.88 594 office actions across 316 applications
Applications with office actions 98.1% 310 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.9%
1 OA 149 47.2%
2 OAs 83 26.3%
3 OAs 45 14.2%
4 OAs 25 7.9%
5+ OAs 8 2.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 78.8% 2008 2009: 74.4% 2009 2010: 91.2% 2010 2011: 83.3% 2011 2012: 78.8% 2012 2013: 73.3% 2013 2014: 76.9% 2014 2016: 25.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018 2025: 60.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008332678.8%
2009392974.4%
2010575291.2%
2011423583.3%
2012524178.8%
2013453373.3%
2014262076.9%
20164125.0%
2017100.0%
201844100.0%
20255360.0%
2026800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 310 2.9% 8.1% 58.7% 6.5%
Action 2 161 6.2% 10.6% 57.1% 16.1%
Action 3 78 3.8% 11.5% 75.6% 6.4%
Action 4 33 3.0% 9.1% 72.7% 12.1%
Action 5 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.0% 1 of 20 office actions
All years 3.9% 23 of 594 office actions
Change +1.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.6%
2.1%
0.0%
3.8%
7.1%
7.4%
2014: Alice
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
11.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
23.1% 3/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
53.8% 7/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 27, 2017 12/833,589 Reversed §103
Aug. 1, 2016 13/122,544 Affirmed §102 · §103
May. 11, 2016 12/967,355 Affirmed §103
Sep. 2, 2015 12/145,052 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 24, 2015 11/969,033 Affirmed N/A
May. 30, 2014 10/899,808 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 19, 2013 11/835,519 Reversed N/A
Jan. 28, 2013 11/424,593 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §120
Jan. 14, 2013 11/166,608 Reversed N/A
Oct. 29, 2012 11/099,017 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
May. 14, 2012 10/769,275 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 19, 2012 11/050,551 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.