AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Lee Fineman

Examiner Lee Fineman appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 60.6%, they average 1.29 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.29
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-2313
Predicted Supervisor
Scott Baderman
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3644
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2190 - Inter-process Communications and Software Development

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
155
Granted Applications
94
Non-Granted Applications
61
Avg OA / Grant
1.29
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (3 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2121 , 2191 , 2872
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 60.6% 1.29
Art Unit 32 60.2% 1.80
Group 221 57.3% 2.03
Tech Center 1,706 55.9% 2.19
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2021 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 1 1 100.0%
2009 14 12 85.7%
2010 75 70 93.3%
2011 6 5 83.3%
2012 14 1 7.1%
2013 17 0 0.0%
2014 1 0 0.0%
2015 2 0 0.0%
2016 1 0 0.0%
2017 2 0 0.0%
No observed data for 2018-2019.
2020 7 2 28.6%
2021 4 1 25.0%
No observed data for 2022-2024.
2025 9 2 22.2%
2026 2 0 0.0%

94 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 150 4.0% 34.0% 58.7% 0.0%
2 38 0.0% 15.8% 71.1% 5.3%
3 9 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 0.0%
4 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
5 4 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%
6 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2009
5.2%
2010
0.0%
2011
0.0%
2012
5.6%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
0.0%
2017
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.