Examiner Li B. Zhen

Grant ratio: 64.0% (32nd percentile in Art Unit 2194 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.20. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.20
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78934
Primary art unit
2194
Work group
2190
Technology center
2100
Applications
139
Granted applications
89
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3768

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 49.5% 2.09
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 293 office actions across 139 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 137 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 1.4%
1 OA 54 38.8%
2 OAs 40 28.8%
3 OAs 21 15.1%
4 OAs 15 10.8%
5+ OAs 7 5.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 75.6% 2008 2009: 65.2% 2009 2010: 68.8% 2010 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014 2019: 0.0% 2019 2020: 33.3% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
2008453475.6%
2009463065.2%
2010322268.8%
2013100.0%
201411100.0%
2019100.0%
20203133.3%
2021300.0%
202411100.0%
2025100.0%
2026400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 137 1.5% 2.9% 87.6% 1.5%
Action 2 83 3.6% 1.2% 90.4% 3.6%
Action 3 43 0.0% 0.0% 93.0% 2.3%
Action 4 22 0.0% 0.0% 72.7% 0.0%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 6 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 12.5% 1 of 8 office actions
All years 1.7% 5 of 293 office actions
Change +10.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
25.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 16, 2017 12/910,712 Reversed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 11/953,269 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 6, 2013 10/858,657 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 31, 2013 10/926,255 Affirmed §103
Feb. 8, 2013 10/753,106 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 12, 2012 10/808,223 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.