Examiner Craig Dorais

Grant ratio: 77.8% (79th percentile in Art Unit 2194 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.04. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 77.8%
Average office actions / grant 2.04
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87080
Primary art unit
2194
Work group
2190
Technology center
2100
Applications
460
Granted applications
358
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3371
Supervisor
Kevin Young
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3180

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 28 49.5% 2.09
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.02 931 office actions across 460 applications
Applications with office actions 99.3% 457 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.7%
1 OA 216 47.0%
2 OAs 112 24.3%
3 OAs 60 13.0%
4 OAs 49 10.7%
5+ OAs 20 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 70.4% 2011 2012: 65.2% 2012 2013: 83.3% 2013 2014: 79.2% 2014 2015: 89.2% 2015 2016: 92.7% 2016 2017: 60.9% 2017 2018: 88.6% 2018 2019: 90.6% 2019 2020: 90.5% 2020 2021: 88.9% 2021 2022: 91.7% 2022 2023: 88.9% 2023 2024: 95.7% 2024 2025: 27.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2010100.0%
2011271970.4%
2012463065.2%
2013242083.3%
2014483879.2%
2015373389.2%
2016413892.7%
2017231460.9%
2018443988.6%
2019322990.6%
2020211990.5%
2021181688.9%
2022242291.7%
2023181688.9%
2024232295.7%
202511327.3%
20262200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 457 3.3% 8.3% 69.8% 15.1%
Action 2 241 7.1% 6.2% 81.3% 5.4%
Action 3 129 3.1% 4.7% 86.8% 5.4%
Action 4 69 1.4% 4.3% 92.8% 0.0%
Action 5 20 0.0% 5.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.7% 5 of 88 office actions
All years 4.0% 37 of 931 office actions
Change +1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.7%
28.9%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.2%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
9.1%
13.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 7, 2019 14/984,113 Affirmed §103 · §112
Sep. 13, 2017 14/397,585 Affirmed §103
Dec. 23, 2016 11/897,707 Affirmed §103
Oct. 30, 2015 12/628,627 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 29, 2015 12/553,416 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 14, 2015 12/118,315 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 26, 2015 11/958,696 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 6, 2015 11/936,285 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.