Examiner Wissam Rashid

Grant ratio: 81.6% (87th percentile in Art Unit 2195 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87233
Primary art unit
2195
Work group
2190
Technology center
2100
Applications
684
Granted applications
558
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3758
Supervisor
Aimee Li
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4169

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 54.5% 2.03
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 1,300 office actions across 684 applications
Applications with office actions 98.4% 673 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 11 1.6%
1 OA 382 55.8%
2 OAs 119 17.4%
3 OAs 86 12.6%
4 OAs 48 7.0%
5+ OAs 38 5.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2011: 56.3% 2011 2012: 57.1% 2012 2013: 78.1% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 88.1% 2015 2016: 86.5% 2016 2017: 93.9% 2017 2018: 85.0% 2018 2019: 91.7% 2019 2020: 89.8% 2020 2021: 97.8% 2021 2022: 89.1% 2022 2023: 93.0% 2023 2024: 92.0% 2024 2025: 64.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
201116956.3%
2012352057.1%
2013322578.1%
2014322887.5%
2015423788.1%
2016524586.5%
2017494693.9%
2018605185.0%
2019484491.7%
2020494489.8%
2021454497.8%
2022464189.1%
2023575393.0%
2024504692.0%
2025372464.9%
20263300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 673 2.5% 13.2% 68.1% 8.0%
Action 2 291 3.4% 5.8% 81.1% 5.2%
Action 3 172 2.3% 1.7% 90.1% 2.9%
Action 4 86 1.2% 3.5% 89.5% 1.2%
Action 5 38 0.0% 2.6% 89.5% 2.6%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 7.3% 14 of 192 office actions
All years 2.5% 32 of 1,300 office actions
Change +4.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
5.2%
1.2%
1.1%
1.8%
2019: PEG
1.0%
1.2%
0.0%
4.4%
6.9%
2024: AI examples
13.3%
2025: August memo
4.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 6, 2024 15/875,891 Affirmed §103
Apr. 30, 2024 16/720,410 Affirmed §101
Apr. 16, 2015 11/935,574 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 20, 2014 11/588,205 Affirmed §103
Aug. 19, 2014 11/465,179 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.