Examiner Bing Zhao

Grant ratio: 84.7% (91st percentile in Art Unit 2195 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.68. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 84.7%
Average office actions / grant 1.68
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87511
Primary art unit
2195
Work group
2190
Technology center
2100
Applications
464
Granted applications
393
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1745
Supervisor
James Trujillo
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3677

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 35 54.5% 2.03
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.66 771 office actions across 464 applications
Applications with office actions 99.1% 460 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.9%
1 OA 258 55.6%
2 OAs 143 30.8%
3 OAs 31 6.7%
4 OAs 16 3.4%
5+ OAs 12 2.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 89.5% 2011 2012: 85.7% 2012 2013: 90.0% 2013 2014: 95.6% 2014 2015: 84.8% 2015 2016: 96.2% 2016 2017: 88.6% 2017 2018: 89.2% 2018 2019: 87.5% 2019 2020: 88.5% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021 2022: 92.9% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 90.0% 2024 2025: 48.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2011191789.5%
2012353085.7%
2013403690.0%
2014454395.6%
2015332884.8%
2016525096.2%
2017443988.6%
2018373389.2%
2019242187.5%
2020262388.5%
20211818100.0%
2022141392.9%
2023141285.7%
2024201890.0%
2025251248.0%
20261800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 460 1.5% 4.8% 86.5% 7.0%
Action 2 202 1.0% 4.0% 88.1% 6.9%
Action 3 59 3.4% 0.0% 84.7% 11.9%
Action 4 28 0.0% 3.6% 89.3% 7.1%
Action 5 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 6 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.9% 4 of 102 office actions
All years 1.7% 13 of 771 office actions
Change +2.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.6%
2.4%
4.1%
3.8%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
6.7%
2025: August memo
2.5%
5.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 9, 2025 16/740,794 Affirmed §103
Feb. 16, 2021 15/242,614 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 28, 2020 14/706,015 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.