Examiner Duy Khuong Thanh Nguyen

Grant ratio: 70.2% (70th percentile in Art Unit 2199 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.21
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88162
Primary art unit
2199
Work group
2190
Technology center
2100
Applications
600
Granted applications
421
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7139
Supervisor
Lewis Bullock
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3759

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 51.7% 2.32
Group 238 52.6% 2.03
Tech Center 1,781 52.8% 2.19
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.15 1,288 office actions across 600 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 597 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.5%
1 OA 209 34.8%
2 OAs 205 34.2%
3 OAs 104 17.3%
4 OAs 53 8.8%
5+ OAs 26 4.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 25.0% 2011 2012: 57.7% 2012 2013: 67.5% 2013 2014: 72.4% 2014 2015: 82.4% 2015 2016: 82.1% 2016 2017: 81.3% 2017 2018: 85.2% 2018 2019: 80.9% 2019 2020: 89.6% 2020 2021: 95.7% 2021 2022: 86.7% 2022 2023: 88.5% 2023 2024: 84.6% 2024 2025: 39.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201112325.0%
2012261557.7%
2013402767.5%
2014292172.4%
2015342882.4%
2016282382.1%
2017322681.3%
2018272385.2%
2019473880.9%
2020484389.6%
2021464495.7%
2022453986.7%
2023524688.5%
2024262284.6%
2025592339.0%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 597 0.3% 9.5% 83.9% 1.2%
Action 2 388 0.3% 2.3% 95.1% 1.3%
Action 3 183 0.5% 1.1% 95.1% 1.6%
Action 4 79 1.3% 2.5% 94.9% 0.0%
Action 5 26 0.0% 3.8% 88.5% 3.8%
Action 6 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Action 9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.8% 2 of 266 office actions
All years 0.5% 6 of 1,288 office actions
Change +0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
0.9%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 10, 2017 13/454,420 Affirmed §103
Oct. 14, 2015 12/167,266 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 24, 2015 12/113,151 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 17, 2015 12/189,258 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.