AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Alvin H Tan

Examiner Alvin H Tan appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 49.4%, they average 3.24 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group About Average
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Hard
Average OA / Grant 3.24
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-8595
Predicted Supervisor
Scott Baderman
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3644
Tech Center
2100 - Computer Architecture Software and Information Security
Group
2170 - Graphical User Interface, Document Processing, Power, and Other

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
575
Granted Applications
284
Non-Granted Applications
291
Avg OA / Grant
3.24
Last OA Observed
July 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2118 , 2144 , 2172 , 2173 , 2178
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 49.4% 3.24
Art Unit 16 49.6% 3.07
Group 189 49.0% 2.74
Tech Center 1,749 54.1% 2.19
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 28 8 28.6%
2009 19 6 31.6%
2010 37 21 56.8%
2011 27 17 63.0%
2012 33 22 66.7%
2013 28 16 57.1%
2014 23 13 56.5%
2015 33 19 57.6%
2016 29 13 44.8%
2017 33 14 42.4%
2018 24 17 70.8%
2019 28 8 28.6%
2020 46 27 58.7%
2021 26 18 69.2%
2022 29 19 65.5%
2023 29 22 75.9%
2024 23 17 73.9%
2025 38 7 18.4%
2026 42 0 0.0%

284 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 560 2.0% 13.2% 82.1% 2.0%
2 430 2.3% 12.1% 83.7% 1.6%
3 301 1.7% 8.3% 88.4% 1.7%
4 223 0.9% 6.7% 89.2% 2.2%
5 122 1.6% 5.7% 86.9% 4.1%
6 73 1.4% 1.4% 93.2% 2.7%
7 38 0.0% 2.6% 86.8% 10.5%
8 24 0.0% 0.0% 95.8% 4.2%
9 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
10 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2007
0.9%
2008
1.9%
2009
4.0%
2010
4.3%
2011
4.3%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
1.2%
2016
1.1%
2017
1.9%
2018
0.0%
2019
2.6%
2020
0.0%
2021
1.2%
2022
1.2%
2023
1.2%
2024
2.5%
2025
1.8%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.