AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Matthew E Heneghan

Examiner Matthew E Heneghan appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 57.0%, they average 2.26 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile leans toward §103 and elevated §112 usage.

Difficulty vs AU Very Easy
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.26
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 272-3834
Predicted Supervisor
Michael Fuelling
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-1367
Tech Center
3900 - Reexam and Abandonment
Group
3990 - 3990

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
100
Granted Applications
57
Non-Granted Applications
43
Avg OA / Grant
2.26
Last OA Observed
June 2026 (0 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2139 , 2439 , 3992
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 57.0% 2.26
Art Unit 37 49.2% 2.52
Group 70 56.8% 2.28
Tech Center 68 56.3% 2.30
USPTO 16,348 53.5% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 7 6 85.7%
No observed data for 2009-2014.
2015 4 3 75.0%
2016 3 3 100.0%
2017 6 5 83.3%
2018 9 6 66.7%
2019 5 5 100.0%
2020 8 6 75.0%
2021 6 4 66.7%
2022 3 3 100.0%
2023 6 4 66.7%
2024 7 6 85.7%
2025 19 6 31.6%
2026 17 0 0.0%

57 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 98 3.1% 10.2% 33.7% 25.5%
2 57 1.8% 19.3% 26.3% 19.3%
3 25 0.0% 28.0% 40.0% 28.0%
4 14 0.0% 14.3% 35.7% 28.6%
5 8 0.0% 50.0% 12.5% 12.5%
6 2 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
0.0%
2014
0.0%
2015
0.0%
2016
7.7%
2017
0.0%
2018
0.0%
2019
0.0%
2020
6.3%
2021
8.3%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
2.9%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.