Examiner Raj Jain

Grant ratio: 81.3% (75th percentile in Art Unit 2411 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 81.3%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79472
Primary art unit
2411
Work group
2410
Technology center
2400
Applications
854
Granted applications
694
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3145
Supervisor
Andrew Lai
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-9741

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.4% 2.20
Group 166 51.7% 1.94
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.87 1,600 office actions across 854 applications
Applications with office actions 98.2% 839 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 15 1.8%
1 OA 419 49.1%
2 OAs 248 29.0%
3 OAs 73 8.5%
4 OAs 60 7.0%
5+ OAs 39 4.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 78.1% 2008 2009: 70.8% 2009 2010: 83.3% 2010 2011: 92.3% 2011 2012: 89.6% 2012 2013: 90.5% 2013 2014: 84.6% 2014 2015: 81.8% 2015 2016: 88.4% 2016 2017: 84.0% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 89.7% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 94.1% 2021 2022: 94.9% 2022 2023: 92.7% 2023 2024: 91.5% 2024 2025: 62.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008322578.1%
2009654670.8%
2010544583.3%
2011393692.3%
2012484389.6%
2013423890.5%
2014262284.6%
2015332781.8%
2016433888.4%
2017504284.0%
2018454088.9%
2019292689.7%
2020353085.7%
2021686494.1%
2022595694.9%
2023555192.7%
2024474391.5%
2025352262.9%
20264900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 839 2.0% 24.6% 62.1% 2.6%
Action 2 420 1.0% 13.8% 74.5% 6.7%
Action 3 172 0.0% 10.5% 79.7% 6.4%
Action 4 99 0.0% 12.1% 77.8% 6.1%
Action 5 39 5.1% 5.1% 79.5% 7.7%
Action 6 17 0.0% 5.9% 82.4% 11.8%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 8 4 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 264 office actions
All years 1.4% 23 of 1,600 office actions
Change -1.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.6%
0.0%
2.8%
0.0%
2.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
3.6%
3.6%
3.9%
2.3%
1.3%
2019: PEG
5.0%
1.3%
0.9%
0.0%
2.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
57.1% 4/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
85.7% 6/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
23.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 19, 2018 13/382,560 Reversed §112
Mar. 30, 2017 10/103,102 Reversed §103
Aug. 5, 2016 13/007,577 Reversed N/A
Jun. 30, 2016 13/146,494 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 31, 2015 12/132,282 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 25, 2013 11/105,401 Reversed §101 · §103 · §112
Jul. 30, 2012 10/799,704 Affirmed in part §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.