Examiner Albert Shih

Grant ratio: 81.6% (86th percentile in Art Unit 2411 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.12. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2022
Grant ratio 81.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.12
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89381
Primary art unit
2411
Work group
2410
Technology center
2400
Applications
125
Granted applications
102

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 63.4% 2.20
Group 166 51.7% 1.94
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 266 office actions across 126 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 126 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 53 42.1%
2 OAs 41 32.5%
3 OAs 11 8.7%
4 OAs 14 11.1%
5+ OAs 7 5.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 100.0% 2011 2012: 84.6% 2012 2013: 88.5% 2013 2014: 87.5% 2014 2015: 65.2% 2015 2016: 77.8% 2016 2017: 100.0% 2017 2022: 100.0% 2022

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201111100.0%
2012131184.6%
2013262388.5%
2014322887.5%
2015231565.2%
2016272177.8%
201711100.0%
202222100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 126 0.0% 19.8% 68.3% 7.1%
Action 2 73 0.0% 15.1% 72.6% 8.2%
Action 3 32 0.0% 12.5% 81.3% 6.3%
Action 4 21 0.0% 4.8% 81.0% 9.5%
Action 5 7 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
Action 6 3 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 266 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.5 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 31, 2016 13/212,788 Reversed §103
Feb. 22, 2016 12/937,034 Affirmed New ground of rejection §102 · §103
Feb. 10, 2016 13/015,356 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
Dec. 22, 2014 12/388,727 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.