AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Mandish Randhawa

Examiner Mandish Randhawa appears to be very difficult relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 56.5%, they average 2.85 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU Very Hard
Difficulty vs Group Very Hard
Difficulty vs TC Very Hard
Difficulty vs USPTO About Average
Average OA / Grant 2.85
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
19 years (2008-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-5650
Predicted Supervisor
Chirag Shah
Supervisor Phone
(571) 272-3144
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2470 - Multiplex and VoIP

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
605
Granted Applications
342
Non-Granted Applications
263
Avg OA / Grant
2.85
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2415 , 2419 , 2475 , 2477
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 56.5% 2.85
Art Unit 21 67.8% 2.23
Group 203 65.0% 1.93
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2008; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2008 9 2 22.2%
2009 20 9 45.0%
2010 19 10 52.6%
2011 30 18 60.0%
2012 37 17 45.9%
2013 35 20 57.1%
2014 28 11 39.3%
2015 25 11 44.0%
2016 37 24 64.9%
2017 27 19 70.4%
2018 38 31 81.6%
2019 28 19 67.9%
2020 37 24 64.9%
2021 40 28 70.0%
2022 36 25 69.4%
2023 42 35 83.3%
2024 38 33 86.8%
2025 52 6 11.5%
2026 27 0 0.0%

342 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 618 0.8% 4.0% 78.2% 1.9%
2 435 2.3% 3.0% 83.2% 4.8%
3 276 1.1% 3.6% 87.7% 4.0%
4 189 1.6% 1.6% 86.8% 6.3%
5 114 0.9% 0.9% 86.8% 6.1%
6 72 0.0% 0.0% 97.2% 0.0%
7 45 0.0% 0.0% 84.4% 8.9%
8 28 0.0% 7.1% 82.1% 7.1%
9 17 0.0% 5.9% 70.6% 17.6%
10 8 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 12.5%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2008
2.9%
2009
4.3%
2010
1.6%
2011
0.0%
2012
2.3%
2013
1.0%
2014
1.0%
2015
1.0%
2016
2.2%
2017
1.0%
2018
1.3%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
0.0%
2024
1.0%
2025
3.7%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.