Examiner Humam Satti

Grant ratio: 55.2% (15th percentile in Art Unit 2422 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.52. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.52
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
87851
Primary art unit
2422
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
487
Granted applications
269
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1709
Supervisor
John Miller
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7353

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 59.7% 1.88
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.55 1,242 office actions across 487 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 484 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.6%
1 OA 178 36.6%
2 OAs 120 24.6%
3 OAs 58 11.9%
4 OAs 68 14.0%
5+ OAs 60 12.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 13.3% 2011 2012: 68.0% 2012 2013: 54.5% 2013 2014: 63.0% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 37.5% 2016 2017: 51.6% 2017 2018: 58.5% 2018 2019: 71.0% 2019 2020: 66.7% 2020 2021: 85.2% 2021 2022: 76.3% 2022 2023: 88.0% 2023 2024: 60.9% 2024 2025: 29.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201115213.3%
2012251768.0%
2013331854.5%
2014271763.0%
2015361850.0%
2016321237.5%
2017311651.6%
2018412458.5%
2019312271.0%
2020362466.7%
2021272385.2%
2022382976.3%
2023252288.0%
2024231460.9%
2025371129.7%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 484 0.6% 7.2% 84.9% 0.8%
Action 2 306 0.7% 5.2% 91.8% 1.0%
Action 3 186 0.5% 2.2% 95.2% 1.6%
Action 4 128 0.0% 2.3% 96.9% 0.8%
Action 5 60 1.7% 5.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 6 37 0.0% 5.4% 91.9% 0.0%
Action 7 22 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 198 office actions
All years 0.6% 7 of 1,242 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.6%
0.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
1.9%
1.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 4/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
11.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 4, 2020 12/895,321 Affirmed §103 · §120
Dec. 27, 2019 15/036,563 Reversed §101 · §103
Jan. 30, 2019 14/131,161 Reversed §103
Aug. 29, 2018 13/888,941 Reversed §103
Aug. 23, 2018 14/165,513 Reversed §103
Feb. 24, 2016 12/451,689 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.