Examiner Jason Thomas

Grant ratio: 46.5% (16th percentile in Art Unit 2423 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.62. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2025
Grant ratio 46.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.62
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84481
Primary art unit
2423
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
202
Granted applications
94

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 50.2% 2.84
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.24 665 office actions across 205 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 205 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 51 24.9%
2 OAs 50 24.4%
3 OAs 21 10.2%
4 OAs 34 16.6%
5+ OAs 49 23.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 16.7% 2008 2009: 11.8% 2009 2010: 38.9% 2010 2011: 37.5% 2011 2012: 40.9% 2012 2013: 71.7% 2013 2014: 78.6% 2014 2015: 57.1% 2015 2016: 66.7% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2025: 0.0% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200812216.7%
200917211.8%
201018738.9%
201116637.5%
201222940.9%
2013463371.7%
2014141178.6%
201514857.1%
2016181266.7%
20176466.7%
20251900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 205 0.0% 4.9% 91.7% 2.4%
Action 2 154 0.0% 1.3% 97.4% 1.3%
Action 3 104 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 4 83 1.2% 1.2% 96.4% 0.0%
Action 5 49 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 2.0%
Action 6 34 0.0% 5.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 27 office actions
All years 0.2% 1 of 665 office actions
Change -0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
18.2% 2/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 18, 2017 11/828,624 Affirmed §102 · §103
Aug. 29, 2016 11/320,905 Affirmed §103
Mar. 31, 2016 12/222,796 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Feb. 29, 2016 12/970,215 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Oct. 26, 2015 10/791,831 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 27, 2015 11/878,890 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 18, 2015 11/717,914 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 23, 2014 12/715,760 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 24, 2014 11/516,575 Affirmed §103
Mar. 15, 2013 10/687,239 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 27, 2012 11/467,696 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.