Examiner Aklil Tesfaye

Grant ratio: 56.2% (41st percentile in Art Unit 2423 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.03. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 56.2%
Average office actions / grant 3.03
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85304
Primary art unit
2423
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
265
Granted applications
149

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 50.2% 2.84
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.87 791 office actions across 276 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 276 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 76 27.5%
2 OAs 89 32.2%
3 OAs 37 13.4%
4 OAs 25 9.1%
5+ OAs 49 17.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 75.0% 2008 2009: 31.8% 2009 2010: 40.0% 2010 2011: 41.7% 2011 2012: 43.8% 2012 2013: 40.0% 2013 2014: 55.2% 2014 2015: 57.9% 2015 2016: 60.7% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 73.5% 2018 2019: 72.4% 2019 2020: 50.0% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20084375.0%
200922731.8%
201015640.0%
201112541.7%
201216743.8%
2013251040.0%
2014291655.2%
2015191157.9%
2016281760.7%
2017302066.7%
2018342573.5%
2019292172.4%
20202150.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 276 0.4% 4.3% 90.2% 1.8%
Action 2 200 0.5% 2.0% 95.5% 1.0%
Action 3 111 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 4 74 1.4% 1.4% 97.3% 0.0%
Action 5 49 4.1% 2.0% 91.8% 0.0%
Action 6 35 0.0% 0.0% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 7 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 8 12.5% 0.0% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 6 of 791 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
9.1% 1/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
27.3% 3/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 26, 2018 11/715,185 Affirmed §103
Feb. 13, 2018 13/295,026 Reversed §103
Nov. 28, 2016 13/331,449 Affirmed §103
Mar. 31, 2016 13/095,685 Affirmed §103
Oct. 14, 2015 13/332,980 Affirmed in part N/A
Aug. 28, 2015 11/285,656 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 27, 2015 11/373,178 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 9, 2015 11/694,910 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 30, 2015 12/106,124 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 31, 2014 11/608,488 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2014 11/812,779 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.