Examiner Akshay Doshi

Grant ratio: 54.1% (34th percentile in Art Unit 2423 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.13. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 54.1%
Average office actions / grant 3.13
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88914
Primary art unit
2423
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
305
Granted applications
165
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2736
Supervisor
John W Miller
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7353

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 18 50.2% 2.84
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.92 890 office actions across 305 applications
Applications with office actions 95.1% 290 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 15 4.9%
1 OA 89 29.2%
2 OAs 68 22.3%
3 OAs 31 10.2%
4 OAs 38 12.5%
5+ OAs 64 21.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 100.0% 2012 2013: 64.0% 2013 2014: 65.2% 2014 2015: 40.0% 2015 2016: 43.5% 2016 2017: 55.0% 2017 2018: 61.5% 2018 2019: 90.5% 2019 2020: 69.6% 2020 2021: 47.1% 2021 2022: 72.7% 2022 2023: 73.3% 2023 2024: 66.7% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201222100.0%
2013251664.0%
2014231565.2%
201515640.0%
2016231043.5%
2017201155.0%
2018261661.5%
2019211990.5%
2020231669.6%
202117847.1%
202211872.7%
2023151173.3%
2024211466.7%
2025261350.0%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 290 0.0% 6.6% 90.7% 1.0%
Action 2 201 0.0% 3.5% 94.5% 0.5%
Action 3 133 0.8% 0.8% 96.2% 1.5%
Action 4 102 1.0% 0.0% 96.1% 2.0%
Action 5 64 0.0% 0.0% 98.4% 1.6%
Action 6 40 2.5% 0.0% 95.0% 2.5%
Action 7 23 0.0% 0.0% 95.7% 4.3%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 212 office actions
All years 0.3% 3 of 890 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 2/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
24.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 2, 2019 13/188,620 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 13, 2016 13/285,917 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.