Examiner Olugbenga Idowu

Grant ratio: 64.9% (66th percentile in Art Unit 2425 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.36. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.36
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82671
Primary art unit
2425
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
679
Granted applications
441
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1450
Supervisor
Jung Kim
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3804

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 54.3% 2.69
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.41 1,635 office actions across 679 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 672 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.0%
1 OA 282 41.5%
2 OAs 162 23.9%
3 OAs 91 13.4%
4 OAs 63 9.3%
5+ OAs 74 10.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 13.9% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 30.4% 2011 2012: 56.8% 2012 2013: 61.3% 2013 2014: 59.6% 2014 2015: 58.8% 2015 2016: 74.2% 2016 2017: 73.9% 2017 2018: 82.6% 2018 2019: 89.2% 2019 2020: 89.8% 2020 2021: 82.2% 2021 2022: 96.8% 2022 2023: 91.7% 2023 2024: 81.8% 2024 2025: 53.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008900.0%
200936513.9%
2010211466.7%
201123730.4%
2012372156.8%
2013311961.3%
2014472859.6%
2015342058.8%
2016312374.2%
2017231773.9%
2018463882.6%
2019373389.2%
2020494489.8%
2021453782.2%
2022313096.8%
2023484491.7%
2024443681.8%
2025472553.2%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 672 0.1% 26.3% 69.5% 0.3%
Action 2 390 0.5% 10.0% 88.2% 0.3%
Action 3 228 1.3% 1.8% 96.5% 0.0%
Action 4 137 0.0% 2.9% 94.2% 0.7%
Action 5 74 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 1.4%
Action 6 58 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 36 0.0% 0.0% 97.2% 0.0%
Action 8 19 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 5.3%
Action 9 9 0.0% 0.0% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.5% 1 of 203 office actions
All years 0.4% 6 of 1,635 office actions
Change +0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.4%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
16.7% 1/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Dec. 29, 2020 15/393,516 Affirmed §103
Sep. 24, 2018 14/581,760 Reversed §103
Dec. 19, 2016 13/702,035 Affirmed §103
Aug. 29, 2016 13/275,817 Affirmed §103
May. 23, 2016 13/195,699 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Oct. 31, 2012 09/947,013 Affirmed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.